First of all, let me introduce what is the three-many system

 

The three-many betting method is indeed a relatively complicated system, so a set of effective calculation steps and methods must be stipulated in advance to ensure the normal progress of the betting. The reason why it is so complicated and requires such a large amount of funds is also unavoidable. Otherwise, under the current rules, casinos will not open more and more without fear. It is quite difficult to defeat DC. Without testing and researching tens of millions to hundreds of millions of boot brands, it is difficult to understand the various problems. It is really a fantasy, a kind of beauty of a monkey fishing for the moon, to want to make a profit and defeat DC with a small amount of funds and a simple method.

In the long run, and in large samples, the law of large numbers is well known to be a formidable obstacle.

 

In the short term, within a small sample range, or more intuitively within a shoe, the uneven density and discrete distribution form have a strong lethality. This is not only reflected in the proportion of dealers and players, but also in the combination of various types of graphics. In a shoe card, the banker's proportion can fluctuate between 30.0% and 78.33%, and the player's proportion can fluctuate between 21.67% and 70.0%, or even larger. The range of fluctuations is quite astonishing, and the ratio of 50/50 that is generally believed to be very different. The randomness of independent events clearly tells us that the outcome of the next hand is unpredictable, and the trend of the next stage is also unpredictable. One of the three trends, good, bad, and neutral, will inevitably appear later. Even if you guess randomly, there will be a certain percentage of correctness. , so there will be situation B later, or there will be no situation B. Such a causal thinking mode to seek a way to win, unfortunately, this way does not work.

 

No betting method can change the hit rate, and the hit rate is the same for all betting methods. Within a few or dozens of boots in a small sample range, there may be a deviation in the hit rate, but there is no such possibility in a large sample range or full array. So don't easily believe the conclusions in the small sample range. This proposition can be fully explained by simple permutations and combinations of knowledge.

 

One of the problems we have to solve first is how to obtain positive returns under the law of large numbers. This may seem like an absurd proposition, an impossible thing, but it is not.

 

The law of large numbers only tells us: the final trend of the banker-player ratio is 50.68%:49.32%, the winning rate of the banker is 50.68%*1.95=98.826%, and the net loss rate is -1.174%. The player's win rate is 49.32%*2=98.64%, and the net loss rate is -1.36%. In the case of a flat bet or a bet with a small change, the duo will definitely get a negative return. However, in the case of a bet with a large change range, the result becomes quite complicated, and it cannot be simply judged whether the final return is positive or negative. is negative. The goal of our research is how to use the characteristics of the cable to change the proportional relationship between winning and losing, creating a situation where losing money is in small bets and winning money is in big bets, so that when the ratio of winning and losing times remains unchanged (this is The law of large numbers), the total winning amount > the total losing amount, forming the result of long-term gambling.

 

Each kind of cable will be broken, and there are fixed M times of cable breaking periods. For example, the cable break cycle of the three-type straight cable or the double-bore cable is 7 times (there is no difference between the two), 15 times for the four-type straight cable, and 31 times for the five-type cable. After the cable breaks, use the stair cable method to increase the amount of bets, and then use a certain number of times, such as 0.8M times, to compensate. After N times of cable breakage and compensation, we lost NM times in total. In terms of winning, we used 0.8NM times to complete the compensation task, and the remaining NM-0.8NM=0.2NM times are our profits.

 

At this point, is the problem completely solved? No! We also need to face the real problem of non-uniform density. It often happens that you lose and you lose, and you win and you win. This is similar to the law of waves mentioned by some gamblers. It is impossible to predict how many times the cable will be broken in a row from the first time the cable is broken and cannot be compensated in time. Therefore, we need a certain number of steps to buffer and set a reasonable stop loss point. As a result, high demands are placed on funds. According to the Monte Carlo analogy test of hundreds of millions of shoe brands and the calculation of mathematical function graph theory and limit theory, it is known that at least 9 layers of buffer space can guarantee victory and effectively cope with the violent impact of uneven density, otherwise , It can only be said that there is a possibility of winning, but it cannot be said that it is a must.

 

A betting method, if there is no compensation mechanism for cable breakage, no buffering and resistance to amplitude, and no effective and reasonable means of using the law of large numbers, it will inevitably lead to the result of losing money and leaving, and it is difficult to achieve long-term du The will to win. This is also the fate of the vast majority of people fighting in DC.